Friday, May 30, 2008

The Earth Destroyed by Fire?

Concerning the idea that the earth will be consumed in a great conflagration at the end, Michael Wittmer writes in Heaven is a Place on Earth:

This popular, though misguided notion likely arises from a misunderstanding of 2 Peter 3:10-13:

But the day of the Lord will come like a thief. The heavens will disappear with a roar; the elements will be destroyed by fire, and the earth and everything in it will be laid bare. Since everything will be destroyed in this way, what kind of people ought you to be? You ought to live holy and godly lives as you look forward to the day of God and speed its coming. That day will bring about the destruction of the heavens by fire, and the elements will melt in the heat. But in keeping with his promise we are looking forward to a new heaven and a new earth, the home of righteousness.

During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the best available Greek manuscripts of 2 Peter 3:10 read that “the earth and all of its works will be burned up.” This is how every translation of that period, including the King James Version, rendered the verse. It is easy to see how whole generations of Christians learned from their Bibles to expect a future fire that would annihilate the entire world.

However, scholars have since discovered older, more reliable Greek manuscripts, and these texts say that rather than burning up, “the earth and all of its works will be found.” Instead of being destroyed, this term “found” implies that the quality of our works will be “laid bare,” discovered for all to see. Much like gold passing through a smelting furnace, the good that we do will be purified while our less noble efforts will slough off. Read this way, Peter’s vision of a coming conflagration seems to be purging rather than annihilating fire.

Perhaps this is why Peter compares the coming “destruction” by fire with the world’s previous “destruction” by water (2 Peter 3:6-7). Justas the Great Flood did not annihilate the world but primarily cleansed it of its numerous sinners, so the impending fire seems to perform an ethical cleansing rather than an ontological annihilation. In short, if the “destruction” of the flood did not annihilate the world, why should we think that the future “destruction” by fire will do so?

Peter’s point is that since the coming conflagration will purge the earth of its impurities, strive to live such good lives that when you and the works of your hands pass through the refining fire, both you and your cultural contributions will survive. Thus, rather than give cause for despair, Peter’s admonition inspires hope that our highest cultural achievements, such as the Mona Lisa, Westminster Abbey, and Eine Kleine Nachtmusik, will make it through to the new heaven and new earth.

12 comments:

Unknown said...

An interesting thought. Restoration instead of new creation. I am not sure the Mona Lisa will make it through the refining fire but it reminds me that we should be very aware of how we spend our time and energy. Will our effort matter?

You have often reminded us that God restores. He is restoring us and our relationship with Him and he will restore the earth by purifying it with fire, removing all that is not Holy.

Dan said...

Do you know what a red giant is?
Do you realize that the sun will become a red giant at some point in the future? When this occurs, the earth will be destroyed by fire!

Anonymous said...

how does viagra work viagra jokes viagra covered by insurance sample of viagra free trial of viagra viagra herb alternative side effects of viagra is viagra safe for women get viagra viva viagra song viagra generic herbal viagra reviews viagra faq viagra herb alternative

Anonymous said...

I want not approve on it. I assume nice post. Especially the appellation attracted me to review the whole story.

Anonymous said...

Good dispatch and this mail helped me alot in my college assignement. Say thank you you seeking your information.

Anonymous said...

Well I agree but I contemplate the list inform should acquire more info then it has.

Anonymous said...

Hi everyone
My name is Tom,

I'm excited to be part of this large and growing forum of great people and thankyou all for making me feel welcome. I just joined today.

My special interests or skills are:
- HTML
- SEO
- Web design
- Internet business

I am happy to help others that need it and offer advice where possible :)

Waiting your reply..

Unknown said...

people are animals on the earth. the earth will not have an end. A big disaster is going to occur on earth. The next generation continuous they will come to know about the people how they lived on earth what the living styles of the people their cultures creed physical appearances religion .

Unknown said...

people are animals on the earth. the earth will not have an end. A big disaster is going to occur on earth. The next generation continuous they will come to know about the people how they lived on earth what the living styles of the people their cultures creed physical appearances religion .

Chazmasterman said...

You said ......Perhaps this is why Peter compares the coming “destruction” by fire with the world’s previous “destruction” by water (2 Peter 3:6-7). Justas the Great Flood did not annihilate the world but primarily cleansed it of its numerous sinners, so the impending fire seems to perform an ethical cleansing rather than an ontological annihilation. In short, if the “destruction” of the flood did not annihilate the world, why should we think that the future “destruction” by fire will do so?


Simply put... Because revelations tells us so. Why make it any more difficult than that???Stop twisting
" A NEW HEAVEN AND A " ( NEW ) " EARTH. New as in brand New. Not recycled. But Brand New. What part of "NEW" do you not understand ?

Chazmasterman said...

You said ......Perhaps this is why Peter compares the coming “destruction” by fire with the world’s previous “destruction” by water (2 Peter 3:6-7). Justas the Great Flood did not annihilate the world but primarily cleansed it of its numerous sinners, so the impending fire seems to perform an ethical cleansing rather than an ontological annihilation. In short, if the “destruction” of the flood did not annihilate the world, why should we think that the future “destruction” by fire will do so?


Simply put... Because revelations tells us so. Why make it any more difficult than that???Stop twisting
" A NEW HEAVEN AND A " ( NEW ) " EARTH. New as in brand New. Not recycled. But Brand New. What part of "NEW" do you not understand ?

Anonymous said...

aeqwfi7q

c1rwut0o

f54yewr4t536

zhw3734z

kkk9lrm8