Saturday, March 31, 2007

The Posture of a Prophet (3): Criticize and Energize

Continuing out reflections on prophetic ministry/life, Brueggemann gives shape to what the vocation of a prophet is all about: "The task of prophetic ministry is to nurture, nourish, and evoke a consciousness and perception alternative to the consciousness and perception of the dominant culture around us....[It] serves to criticize and dismantle the dominant consciousness. To that extent, it attempts to do what the liberal tendency has done: engage in a rejection and delegitimizing of the present ordering of things. On the other hand, that alternative consciousness to be nurtured serves to energize persons and communities by its promise of another time and situation toward which the community of faith may move...[We must not choose between criticism and energizing] to choose between them is the temptation of liberalism and conservatism. Liberals are good at criticism but often have no word of promise to speak; conservatives tend to future well and invite alternative visions, but a germane criticism by the prophet is often not forthcoming" (The Prophetic Imagination, p. 4-5) .

The point here is that the Church is not to be a body of people who only offer criticism of the world, which we often do, but at times only focused on some types of issues while missing other ones (which the Bibilical prophets focus on: war, oppression of people groups, and yes immorality as well). But it is to be a community that offers energizing visions of alternative practices and ideologies than the world has on offer. And we are to offer that both in our message and our actually living. Our role in the world is to be "salt and light" be being an alternative community--that is what the Sermon on the Mount (Mt. 5-7) is all about. That is what Israel in Egypt/Bablyon/Rome was supposed to be. And what we are called to be in an age of war, abortion, sexual promiscuity, economic/enviromental exploitation--we are to be a community that speaks against such injustice and lives contrary to a world made up of such patterns. We are called to stop the pattern of such a society in its tracks. We stand in its way and say: "this is not the way it is supposed to be", indeed "this is not the way it has to be."

But our calling is deeper than just looking at issue to issue and saying "That is bad"--that was not Moses role in Egypt--his role, like ours was to point out and challenge the enduring larger crisis of history. Politician come and go. Issues flourish and die, and when abuses are taking place it is sruely important to protest, but what is important is why the injustices keep cycling through history and that cannot be blamed ona person, a nation, or anything else--there is something deeper at work--and the roel of the prophet is to identify that thing, expose it and call people to live alternatively to it. Again Brueggemann helps us here:
"Moses did not engage in anything like what we identify as social action. He was not engaged in a struggle to transform a regime; rather, his concern was with the consciousness that undergirded and made such a regime possible...specific actions of a political kind are at times mandatory according to the gospel. But they are not inherently linked to nor the focus of prophetic ministry any more than is a hopstial call or a service of worship, Moses was not concerned with societal betterment through the repentence of a regime but rather with totally dismantling it in order to permit a new reality to appear" (21).

So the question becomes: how is the churh an alternative community to that of the empire? Or does it so reflect the empire that no one can tell the difference anymore? What is the new reality that can appear and how can we model it to show the world that what we are talking about is not fairies, and flying pigs, is not impossible, (because the empire has convinced people that it is impossible: that third world debt and rich getting richer ont he backs of the poor is "just the way it is")-- but that such alternative community is a reality on offer by the God of all creation? Now that is a vision of energizing hope that I can spend my life working to see come into being!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I appreciate the emphasis on a non-apathetic approach to the issues of our society. How do we combat the sense of hopelessness that seems to accompany those issues? How do we move beyond the thinking that "this issue is to big for me"?

This semester I have been blessed by my Christian Imagination class. The focus is more on the arts, but the idea of Christians redeeming their imaginations is one that struck home with me. I think the arts are an accessible and universal avenue through which the propehtic can be heard. The artist is a "builder of vision, reality, and hope".

As Christians, the redemption of our imagination cannot be limited to only the "arts" or the "artists". It might start there, but it must spread to include the whole of the church body. Perhaps we need to seriously evaluate the current status and role of the artist in the church in light of this.

Mark Clark said...

Indeed. The arts: poetry/songs/paintings are one way beyond pronouncement to bring about imagination change. So, though a formal church service might be able to house this--though I don't think we have figured out the best way to do this--how do we "evalutate the crrent staus of the artist in the church" in a more holistic way?

So that everything is not evaluated based on the presence of something in a one hour church service--but during the week, in our lives; how do we highlight the prophetic message through the artists?

Blessings

Anonymous said...

I still think there is room in a one-hour church service for the arts (besides music - which is seemingly the only one of the "arts" to have succeeded in this setting. I once heard someone argue that the universality of music was the reason it has flourished...I'm not sure I buy it). But this is proabably a reaction to the fact that the arts have been largely left out of the service. You speak of holistic art/holistic worship, but what about holistic worship in the one-hour church service?

Sorry, I realize I this seems like a bit of a tangent, but I think the two are inescapably tied.