Oprah-Religion: New Age Spirituality with an Oprah Flare

If anyone wishes to come after me he must deny himself, pick up his cross and follow me. Whoever wants to save his life will lose it. But whoever loses his life for me and for the sake of the gospel will save it. What good is it for a man to gain the whole world, yet forfeit his own soul?
--Jesus, Mark 8.34-36

This past Monday Oprah Winfrey, considered by many to be the world's most influential woman, began a ten-week long online course on the best-selling book, "A New Earth," by New Age guru, Eckhart Tolle. "A New Earth" has already sold some 3.5 million copies worldwide, thanks largely to the publicity given to it by Oprah. According to Oprah, 500,000 people from across the world signed on to the first segment of the online course, to spend an hour and a half listening to Ekhart and Oprah talking about chapter 1 of the book, and taking calls from participants.

In recent years Oprah has been inviting an increasing number of representatives of new age spirituality onto her talk shows, including figures such as Marianne Williamson, Barbara DeAngelis, LaVar Burton, Richard Carlson, Betty Eadie, and many others. Oprah has strongly endorsed many of their works, and has included some of them in her "Book Club" list. Since the beginning of this year Oprah has offered daily classes on her XM radio station on the book "A Course in Miracles." "A Course in Miracles" (or ACIM for short) was written by another major player in the New Age movement, Helen Schucman, who claims that the book was dictated to her by an interior voice, which she identifies with Jesus Christ. In that course, the listener is taught that there is no sin, is told not to make the "mistake" of "clinging to the old rugged cross," and that the name of "Jesus Christ as such is but a symbol."

Oprah, who is a self-labeled "Christian", was recently named the "most dangerous woman in the world" by Bill Keller, considered by some to be the world's leading Internet evangelist. He accused Oprah of peddling the equivalent of "spiritual crack." Keller has been warning the subscribers of his Daily Devotional for years about Oprah and how she uses her TV program to promote every New Age philosophy in the world, including the wildly popular book and DVD last year, "The Secret," which teaches readers or viewers that simply by desiring them strongly enough, one may obtain wealth, health and happiness.

However, rarely has Oprah shown more enthusiasm for a New Age guru than for the so-called Eckhart Tolle, who takes his first name from the well-known 13th century Catholic Rhineland mystic, Meister Eckhart. Tolle is the author of several books including "The Power of Now," and, most recently, "A New Earth."
Much like many other New Age systems, Eckhart's "spirituality" is a vague, ethereal blend of spiritual theories and ideas, gleaned from all of the world's major religions. Eckhart promises the attainment of "inner peace" and a higher state of consciousness by utilizing methods of meditation that plunge one into the "now." He also says that mankind is in a moment of crisis, in which the race must either achieve the next stage in its evolution by attaining "higher consciousness", or destroy itself and the planet.

The title of his newest book, "A New Earth," is taken from Chapter 21 from the Book of Revelations, in which the Biblical visionary says that he "saw a new heaven and a new earth." Throughout his newest book Eckhart sprinkles quotations from Scripture, and he frequently speaks about Christ and Scripture in his talks.
The core of Eckhart's teaching is a religious relativism, in which he eschews all rigid doctrine or exclusive claims to truth as dangerous and manifestations of "egoiic consciousness." "The moment you say 'only my belief' or 'our belief' is true, and you deny other people's beliefs, then you've adopted an ideology," Eckhart told the participants in Monday's online class. "And then religion becomes a closed door."

Eckhart explains away conscience and feelings of guilt as but the consequence of years of conditioning. He told one caller, who confessed that she still feels guilt when she decides against going to church on Sunday, that she must recognize that "the voice" which tells her to go to church is simply the result of social conditioning.

One caller into the show told Oprah that she was a Catholic, and was having trouble seeing how Eckhart's teachings could be reconciled with her Catholicism. Oprah responded that the caller must simply realize that Christianity is but one of many ways to achieve the "higher consciousness," and that the belief that one must follow a set of doctrines is a consequence of "egoiic consciousness." While Christianity is a valid way to achieve high states of spirituality, it must not be considered a unique way, or a "correct way".

"Jesus," said Oprah, "came to show us Christ-consciousness…Jesus came to show us the way of the heart…Jesus came to say, 'Look I'm going to live in the body, in the human body and I'm going to show you how it's done.' These are some principles and some laws that you can use to live by to know that way"

Oprah also indicated that there are many names that one might give to that which she calls "God", including "energy," "consciousness" and "life." Oprah also contrasted what she called the "old" spirituality vs. the "new" spirituality, as espoused by Eckhart. "The old way is the hierarchy has the authority. Church authorities tell you how to worship in church and how to behave outside of church. The new spirituality is that you are your own best authority as you work to know and love yourself, you discover how to live a more spiritual life."


One writer on the message board on Oprah's website wrote a message with the subject line, "Scared I'm replacing my religion, which I love." "I just started the book" she wrote, "and I love the idea of the book but I guess the question I keep repeating in my head is will this be replacing my religion? How do the two work together. Can someone please help ease my mind that I'm not turning on the lord."

However, Keller, and a number of other Christian pastors have begun to actively warn Christians that Oprah and Eckhart's teachings are by no means compatible with Christianity. "Oprah is now trying to be the spiritual guru to this nation," said Keller in an appearance on Fox.

Another pastor, James A. Smith Sr., writing in the Florida Baptist Witness, criticized Oprah's "spirituality" for its emphasis on the power of the individual to define truth and reality, and to totally control one's own life. "What this fails to acknowledge is that man dos not define reality; man does not determine what truth is," wrote Smith. "The source of truth for our decisions and power is the one true God of all reality and He has communicated plenary propositional truths to us in the Bible and remarkably, uniquely in His incarnation in Jesus Christ.

WorldNetDaily columnist Chuck Norris, wrote about Oprah and The New Earth, "The reason Tolle's psychology and spirituality is marketed so easy is that it is an eclectic mix of conventional and unconventional wisdom, and Western and Eastern beliefs, presented in a tolerant, non-threatening, and non-sectarian way. In other words, it's 'Religion Light,' in which one can be spiritual with 'little down and no credit.'"

Norris recommended that his readers simply sit down and read a Bible, rather than "A New Earth." "One could easily save the purchase price of 'A New Earth' and subsequently avoid misleading remarks by reading a Bible, which gives a much more thorough and accurate picture of life's purpose and methods for overcoming its obstacles," said Norris.

Source: http://www.christianity.ca/frame.asp?http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/mar/08030701.html

Telus Stinks!

"In the Greco-Roman world during the height of the Roman empire, individual nation-states were weak, and large cities (Rome, Corinth, Ephesus) operated virtually as independent city-states. Cities, not national governments, ruled the world. Today, technology and mobility are again weakening the control nation states have on their own territory. It is becoming impossible to control the flow of information or capital in and out of countries. Multi-national corporations operate out of major cities but do not submit to or serve the interests of any country."
--Tim Keller, "Advancing the Gospel into the 21st Century"

It baffles my mind how ridiculous some corporations and companies really are. The bigger they get, the harder they are to manage. And one thing always suffers: customer service. Of course I will name names, but I will not recount our story in detail because it would take too long. Suffice it say: "Oh yes we will have your stuff set up for you on Sat March 1--they day you move, no problem" (Feb 8); "Oh no, I am sorry, people do not work on Sat.'s. We can get you someone next Wednesday" (Feb 28);

"A manager, no sorry you can't talk to a manager, but they can't do anything anyway...(10 mins later) Oh yes I guess my manager can do something for you, his name is Frank here is his personal line, someone can come out today and get it done for you" (March 3);

"I am sorry you sat around all day waiting for someone to come and hook your stuff up...no one came you say?" (March 3) "Yeah I don't know why Frank didn't call you back...but we can book a person to come...the first available time is Saturday" (Oh so people do work Saturday's now! So when were you lying last week or now?);

"Well sir..." No I am asking a direct question that has two options: do people work Saturdays or not? "Well, we only have one guy who does your area, and he can't come until Saturday." But you said he doesn't work on Saturdays before. Okay, let me just talk to a manager. "We can't do that sir."

What do you mean you can't do that? You mean you won't do that! You are a multi-billion dollar telecommunications company of which I am a customer and you are saying I cannot talk to a manager, nor can you send someone out to hook up the very service you exist provide! You exist for no other reason than to do this one thing--and you have one guy who does it for my area?

"Well we would have to send someone out to you all the way from Vancouver sir."

All the way from Vancouver? Can I ask you a question? Where are sitting right now?
"Calgary."

Calgary! Well that is helpful. Do you know how far my town is from Vancouver? Do you know how long it would take a Telus guy to drive to my town?

"No sir, I do not."

Twenty minutes.

"Twenty minutes?"

Yes.

"Oh. Well I don't see why that shouldn't be able to happen."

But it won't will it?

"...........probably not."

So, one month after letting this massive telecommunications corporation know that we are moving to a new house and we will need telephone, internet and television in our new home by March 1 we are without it, and without it until Saturday (the day no one supposedly works!),

They told us even yesterday they would be coming (never happened), calling (never happened) and consulting (yeah right!). These people are paid to never let us talk to a manager, never let us off contracts we have signed even if they are negligent, and never to just provide a basic service to their customers--they are too removed from reality, they don't understand life. That we don't have time to sit on the phone with them, sit at home and wait for them, and when we do commit that time they show us great disrespect for not showing up or even calling.

This is a company that made $400 million dollars in profit just in the fourth quarter of 2007! And guess what city they are based out of...Guess. Vancouver.

First off, care about your customers more. Don't talk to them as if they are at fault when the fault clearly lies with the company--it is the oldest play in the book: reverse psychology and manipulation. Talk with enough angst in your voice and confuse the situation until the customer thinks its their fault to take the heat off the company. The only way this useless, disaster of a company got off the hot-seat yesterday was (frustratingly!) because when they had put my wife on hold for the tenth time to "check something" our phone rain out of batteries. If it hadn't she would still be on the phone with them trying to get an allusive manager.

All of this confusion, this chaos these big companies create for the little guy, the red tape, the made-up confusing explanations of reasons for problems for things that have simply solutions (not enough guys in the area, useless people booking moving dates, breakdown in communication), is reason for me to ask: why? Why can't they just be helpful, provide their customers with basic services? Why does everything need to be a big friggin' mess all the time with these people? Have you ever had a normal quick conversation with telecommunications companies?

I understand more and more why the argument against big corporations is quality of service. The guy at Walmart does not know how to fix your car, know what kind of cat food your new kitty needs, how to fit you in a pair of jeans, buy you new snow tires and help counsel your family while, not matter how they market themselves. The guy at Best Buy sometimes has no idea what he is talking about! (Believe me I used to work in retail and I would lie all the time when I didn't know the answer to something, which was every day).

The human element disappears in the big lights of corporate mergers, and we, the customer always get the short end of the stick when it comes to customer service. I know there are great advantages to these massive companies and they services they are able to provide as well, but customer service is not one of them.

"We can't send someone out from Vancouver." What a joke.